You
Are Here: Home
> Resource
Articles > Working
Relationships > Article

|
Untitled Document
Top
Picks for
Tuesday, 02 Dec 2008
|
Plopping:
What To Do About It
by
Rick Brenner
When we offer a contribution to a discussion, and everyone ignores it
and moves on, we sometimes feel that our contribution has 'plopped'.
We feel devalued. Rarely is this interpretation correct. What
is going on?
There, it happened again. Maureen was certain, now, that she
wasn't really part of this team. Every time she offered her
perspective on anything, they would listen politely and then
continue on as if she had said nothing. Everything she said
landed with a plop, so she decided to just sit quietly and endure.
Plopping is a dangerous practice. When we plop the contributions
of others, we risk alienating them, and losing access to whatever
they do have of value.
A reasonable model of most group discussion is a series of
sequential contributions, possibly overlapping in time or concept.
When we make a contribution, we feel validated when it's acknowledged
in some way, positively or negatively. An approving comment,
an extending comment, an expression of disagreement, a difference
of opinion, a counter example, or even a disparaging remark
carries various degrees of validation. Even a negative acknowledgment
lets us know that people did listen.
Sometimes a contribution is ignored completely—it plops.
No following contributions refer to it; the group is utterly
silent with respect to it. When this happens, we can feel rejection
and frustration because we have a seat at the table, but nothing
more.
When our contributions plop, we tend to make a meaning about
the plop that threatens our self-esteem. Although plopping a
colleague's comment can be a deliberate act of rudeness, it
can also be a result of failing to understand, or inattention,
or confusion, or even a distraction. Plopping has so many causes
that it's difficult to conclude that insult was the motivation.
What can you do about plopping?
Connect your comments to the comments of others.
Start your comment with "I agree with what Jen says, and
I'd extend it a bit..."If we all did this, there would
be no plopping at all, and the discussion would be more coherent.
Be aware of biases.
Perhaps you've formed an opinion about someone on the basis
of past performance, gender, past ill feelings, or other factors
unrelated to the discussion content. Since biases can predispose
us to plopping, awareness of our biases helps us avoid it.
Unplopping your own comments doesn't work.
When one of our comments plops, some of us try to force the
conversation back to it, to unplop it. This rarely works. The
more you do this, the more irritated the group becomes.
Offer related contributions.
Unrelated contributions are plop bait. Unless your comment
is clearly relevant to the discussion, some people tend to see
it as an attempt to score by redirecting the discussion. The
more competitive people in the group might even intentionally
plop your contribution. Sometimes, they'll even cut off those
who try to build on it.
I'd like to hear your plop stories, of course, but if you don't
write to me that's OK. I won't feel plopped.
Copyright © 2003 Richard Brenner.
Rick Brenner works with people in problem-solving organizations
who make complex products or sophisticated services that need
state-of-the-art teamwork, and with organizations that want
to achieve high performance by building stronger relationships
among their people.
He publishes Point Lookout, a free weekly email newsletter
of tips, insights and perspectives that help people in dynamic
problem-solving organizations find better ways to work with
each other. It gives concrete, nuts-and-bolts methods for dealing
with real-life situations. Subscribe and check out sample issues
at http://www.chacocanyon.com.

| Hot
Recommendations |
 |
|
| Internet
Mastery Center Blog |
|
|